Home / Resources and Writings / Weblog / Climate Change / DeSmogBlog
DeSmogBlog
At a recent dinner party the topics of global climate change, species loss and sustainability came up again and again. The thing that perplexed everyone was, "Why is no one taking the issue seriously?" Evidence of global warming has been mounting steadily for years and the general consensus of the scientific community is that the climate is warming, due at least in part, to humans releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Many people, this author included, feel that the issues of climate change and species loss are the most important ones before us today. We are risking our future by not actively addressing the unsustainable nature of human activities on earth today.
Jim Hoggan, founder of James Hoggan & Associates, one of Canada's leading public relations firms, thinks experts in his field are clouding the debate on climate change. Hoggan writes for the blog, DeSmogBlog, whose mission is to debunk the climate change deniers who use suspect science and a host of public relations trickery to confuse and mislead the public on this critical issue. He writes, " it is infuriating - as a public relations professional - to watch my colleagues use their skills, their training and their considerable intellect to poison the international debate on climate change.
That's what is happening today, and I think it's a disgrace. On one hand, you have the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the largest and most rigorously peer-reviewed scientific consensus in history, advising that: climate change is real; it is caused by human activity; and it is threatening the planet in ways we can only begin to imagine.
On the other hand, you have an ongoing public debate - not about how to respond, but about whether we should bother, about whether climate change is even a scientific certainty.
This is a triumph of disinformation. It is a living proof of the success of one of the boldest and most extensive PR campaigns in history, primarily financed by the energy industry and executed by some of the best PR talent in the world. As a public relations practitioner, it is a marvel - and a deep humiliation - and I want to see it stop."
Link: DeSmogBlog Debate. Debunk. Decide.
Posted by Eric La Fountaine at 2:01 PM on February 27, 2006
Want to talk about this weblog entry? As of August 22, 2006, all new entries and most older entries are cross-posted to the UBC Botanical Garden Discussion Forums for discussion (you might need to use the search function to find the thread you are looking for).
This is an effort to reduce the amount of time spent dealing with spam (the forums are very good at stopping spam, the weblog commenting system is not so good).
Older entries already containing comments remain open for discussion.
Comments
Oh boy where to start Daniel,
It would be great to have a comprehensive, readable climate change review - say from the last glacial maximum (18,000 years before present). I gather from the little research I have done for the book 'The Jade Garden' pages 43-45 that wild oscillations in temperature, rainfall and vegetation were the norm in south-east Asia and much of the rest of Eurasia during that time till the rise of human civilization. Recent core samples from the Greenland ice sheets also seem to back the idea that much greater forces than humanity were at play before the rise of Homo sapiens and these are still with us to the present today. That in no way suggests humanity has no responsibility in our deplorable ecocidal tendencies; the core samples show clearly our effect on the atmosphere. The point is do we have the data to substantiate our complete culpability as some would argue. My gut feeling is in the end we are arguing percentages of responsibility. We are told human civilization has grown in a period of comparative climatic calm a far cry from the recent past. What frightens me is the Greenland cores indicate the rapidity of change events, that is in decades or less. Whatever the human effect whether 2% or 70% this could be enough to pass beyond one of those 'tipping-points' we hear about. So palaeo-climatologists out there pour it on please!
Posted by: Peter Wharton at March 8, 2006 1:42 PM
Thanks for the link! Nice to see the word getting out. We're expanding the site all the time, so keep checking back for more...
Posted by: Sarah Pullman at May 18, 2006 9:36 PM

