« Previous Day: Rhizomnium glabrescens |
Main
| Next Day: Atriplex hortensis »
May 13, 2008: Boschniakia strobilacea
May 13, 2007:
Rosa 'Ausmas'
May 13, 2006:
Lobelia tupa
May 13, 2005:
Enkianthus campanulatus
April 29, 2008 : Illicium sp.
Plant Family / Families: Illiciaceae
Scientific Name and Author: Illicium sp. (aff. simonsii) DJHC.464
Institution: David C. Lam Asian Garden, University of British Columbia Botanical Garden
Accession Number: 037185-0598-2004
Map Location: via Google Maps
Name Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Today's photo of the day features a photograph taken by me, with a write-up from Connor (Connor neglected to mention the sweet fragrance of this as-yet-unidentified species, so I'll throw that in). Connor writes:
Species of Illicium can be found in both the New and Old World. Native species can be found in both southeast Asia and southeastern North America. The Illiciaceae are contained within the Austrobaileyales, one of the basal angiosperm lineages. The sister group to the Austrobaileyales includes the monocots, eumagnoliids, and eudicots.
In The four-celled female gametophyte of Illicium (Illiciaceae; Austrobaileyales): implications for understanding the origin and early evolution of monocots, eumagnoliids, and eudicots, Williams and Friedman trace the evolution of the female gametophyte through various angiosperm lineages.
The most common female gametophyte, or embryo-sac, in angiosperms is the Polygonum-type. It consists of two synergid cells which attract the growing pollen tubes, and an egg at the micropylar end. At the chalazal end three antipodal cells are present which are thought to function in embryo-sac nutrition. At the centre of the Polygonum-type embryo-sac are two polar nuclei which can fuse to become a binucleate central cell and the triploid (3n) endoserpm upon fertilization.
By examining the four-celled gametophyte found in Illicium, Williams and Friedman hypothesized that this type (also found in another basal angiosperm lineage, Nympheales) is an ancestral feature in the angiosperms. The Polygonum-type and other seven-celled / eight-nucleate embryo-sacs are the product of several modifications to this ancestral type which included the addition of the three antipodal cells and the binucleate central cell. This embryo-sac is a derived character of the monocots, eumagnoliids, and eudicots. Interestingly, the authors note that a seven-celled / eight-nucleate female gametophyte is also found in the most basal angiosperm clade, Amborellaceae. However it does not function in the same way as the similar embryo-sacs found in the higher angiosperms and is thought to be a separate derivation of the seven-celled/ eight-nucleate female gametophyte.
In Developmental evolution of the sexual process in ancient flowering plant lineages (PDF), the same authors provide a thorough description of each embryo-sac development mentioned above along with diagrams.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at April 29, 2008 11:58 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 29, 2008 1:07 PM
is this a star anise
lovely happy new camera daniel
Posted by: elizabeth a airhart at April 29, 2008 1:16 PM
Elizabeth, it is most certainly a relative of what is called a star-anise. As mentioned in a previous post on the same genus, though, not all can be used as a spice: Illicium anisatum.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 29, 2008 2:12 PM
What a neat flower. I am SO glad I took Latin long ago. Otherwise I would hardly understand those technical names. As it is I can figure some of them out, and sort of pass on the ones' I don't understand. This is a good thing, though, I'm not complaining. I just wonder of you and your colleagues talk that way all the time. Lovely little flower, it reminds me of some kind of flower my auntie used to raise.
Posted by: Sue in Bremerton WA at April 29, 2008 3:44 PM
I notice the families are different between today's and Illicium anisatum of March '06.
is the family a recent revision?
Posted by: Travis at April 30, 2008 9:38 AM
Hi Travis,
Yes, I think so - at least it appears to me to be that way according to the APG (if you follow the link to the family and look at the URL, you'll note the URL has Schisandraceae in its anchor tag but links to Illiciaceae).
Actually, I intended to update last year's Illicium yesterday, but I suppose I became distracted by something. Will do so now.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 30, 2008 9:47 AM
Oops! Your e-mail sends us to the link for 3/19/2006, not today's. I didn't even notice until I started reading the comments on that page!
Posted by: Deb at April 30, 2008 10:15 AM
Yes, I updated that entry (the family name, and added the other bits into the new format), and it sent out the notification email. A bit of glitch that I'll have to figure out how not to do in the future.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 30, 2008 10:49 AM
cool explanation of the lineage. i didnt get to read the full text of the paper, but do you know if anyone has found an 8-cell 8-nucleus gametophyte that doesn't undergo the nuclear fusion? seems to me like that would be basal to the polygonum types. A "missing link" so to speak.
Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2008 11:51 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

I should add - this photograph was taken with my new (since December, but not used enough) camera, the Canon G9.