Greenheart Canopy Walkway

« Previous Day: Eucalyptus deglupta | Main | Next Day: Trachycarpus fortunei »
Feb 8, 2010: Pandanus tectorius
Feb 8, 2008: Sclerochiton odoratissimus
Feb 8, 2007: Hakea epiglottis
Feb 8, 2006: Eurya japonica

January 8, 2008 : Balanophora fungosa subsp. indica var. indica and Balanophora fungosa

Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!


Keywords: Balanophoraceae | Balanophora fungosa J. R. & G. Forst. subsp. indica (Arn.) B.Hansen var. indica | Malaysia | Balanophora fungosa J. R. & G. Forst. | southern Vietnam

Balanophora fungosa subsp. indica var. indica
Balanophora fungosa subsp. indica var. indica
Balanophora fungosa

Four different people are responsible for today's entry:

Thank you all for contributing!

Balanophora species are among the most unusual of all higher plants that have been featured here on Botany Photo of the Day. The list of novel characteristics for this genus is lengthy. According to Mabberley (The Plant Book, 2nd ed. 1987, Cambridge), these root parasites are known to parasitize at least 74 species in 35 families (one species, the comparatively well known and widely distributed Balanophora fungosa, has at least 25 host species). Above-ground parts are small and distinctly fungus-like, while underground, the plants produce large tuberous growths without any discernable roots. The tubers are the source for a wax-like substance, balanaphorin, which is the food reserve (instead of starch) for the plants. This material is also used for torches in Java.

Some species of Balanophora are dioecious (male and female flowers are produced on separate plants), while others are monoecious (separate male and female flowers borne on the same plant), such as Balanophora fungosa. In general, the inflorescences burst out of the tuberous structures, leaving a collar at ground level around the base of the flower stalk. Flowers are myiophilous (fly-pollinated) according to some authors. The seeds, which are exceptionally tiny (ca. 7 micrograms apiece) are borne without enclosing carpels. Plants in the genus (and the family, Balanophoraceae) are echlorophyllous (have no chlorophyll) and are holoparasitic (entirely parasitic—completely reliant on their hosts for survival). The 15 species in the genus are all native to the Old World Tropics. For the more botanically inclined, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Web Site and the Parasitic Plants Connection include some fascinating tidbits about the family Balanophoraceae and its relationships to other parasitic plants.

Posted by Daniel Mosquin at January 8, 2008 1:42 AM

Comments

...or read recent comments on all BPotD Entries

Thanks so much for this entry and the fascinating photos. They look like something flies would be attracted to. At first I thought they were fungi. The plant kingdom diversity is phenomenal.

Posted by: Meg Bernstein at January 8, 2008 5:45 AM

WOW! the diversity of higher plants boggles my mind. When will the molecular types find the mechanisms for such evolutionary leaps? (I've never had much faith in DNA sequence change and Mendelian inheritance alone for explanation, there's gotta be more to it)

Posted by: Hollis at January 8, 2008 7:26 AM

The name then mean,"blubber producing"?

Posted by: Big Al at January 8, 2008 1:30 PM

Fascinating. Amazing photographs. Thank you.

Posted by: van at January 8, 2008 2:02 PM

This part of the plant world is very interesting.
I really like the photographs. I do so appreaciate all the information.
Thank you,
Margaret-Rae

Posted by: Margaret-Rae Davis at January 8, 2008 5:15 PM

balano = acorn, -phore (combining form) = bear.

As in, bearing acorns, in reference (I suspect) to the shape of the above-ground protuberances.

Posted by: Douglas Justice at January 8, 2008 7:19 PM

thank you to all
the links will take you places
and pictures that are amazeing
to this persons eyes and hopefully
to your eyes and all the people
one meets along the way
hi to one and all

Posted by: elizabeth a airhart at January 9, 2008 8:15 AM

Wow, when i read "without any discernible roots" and "instead of starch", i was thinking, "well obviously, its a fungus" but when i got to the "some ... are dioecious" part, i had to do a double take before I realized it was really a plant after all. No wonder you mentioned "higher plants"!

Posted by: Joe at January 10, 2008 7:08 AM

Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
Botany Photo of the Day and associated images by UBC Botanical Garden staff are licensed under a Creative Commons License. Images and text by non-UBC contributors are copyright the respective photographers / authors (but often have Creative Commons licenses if contributed via Flickr).

About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums

Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.