UBC Botanical Garden Cafepress Store

« Previous Day: Bejaria resinosa | Main | Next Day: Larrea tridentata »
May 13, 2008: Boschniakia strobilacea
May 13, 2007: Rosa 'Ausmas'
May 13, 2006: Lobelia tupa
May 13, 2005: Enkianthus campanulatus

December 14, 2007 : Larrea tridentata


Keywords: Zygophyllaceae | Larrea tridentata (Sessé & Moc. ex DC.) Coville | Death Valley National Park, California, USA

Larrea tridentata

During a March drive into Death Valley National Park on what seemed like an exceptionally dark night, I was able to identify this species as being in the surrounding area from the car without even seeing it. The smell of the plant wafted into the car from the vents, and there was no mistaking it: creosote.

I'll share some close-up photographs of creosote bush plant tomorrow, but this habitat shot illustrates what Wikipedia calls “the peculiar regularity in the spacing of individual plants within a stand”, i.e., instead of forming dense stands, there is always spacing between individuals. There aren't any citations currently associated with the Wikipedia article on Larrea tridentata, but the reason for the spacing seems to be the extremely effective water-absorption abilities of mature plants preventing the establishment and development of seedlings.

Posted by Daniel Mosquin at December 14, 2007 9:01 AM

Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries


Comments

Larrea tridentata - Z8 - RHS Index of Garden Plants, Griffiths
Larrea tridentata - Z8-10 - A-Z Encyclopedia of Garden Plants, Brickell, Cole, Zuk

Posted by: Beverley at December 14, 2007 9:32 AM

Learn something new every day! I always thought creosote was the buildup remainder from burning wood; I didn't realize it was a plant, itself! Thanks for the continuing education!

Posted by: Deb C. at December 14, 2007 9:33 AM

I had understood the spacing to be due to a growth inhibitor secreted by the roots; it inhibits the growth of other members of the species as well as of other plants. The inhibitor is apparently water soluble, which is why no grasses or other forbs grow near the plants most of the year, but during the rainy season the ground may be covered between and right up to the individual plants. It was further implied that this inhibitor and its solubility was significant in the preference of the creosote bush for soils with a caliche layer, which was theorized prevented the inhibitor from leaching away too quickly to be useful. I first encountered this explanation in a book (sorry, I do not at this time recall author or title; it was at least thirty years ago) solely and specifically devoted to the creosote bush, its characteristics and economic uses. The reference to the preference for caliche was in a not much more recent issue of _Desert Plants_, the periodical of the Boyce Thompson Arboretum in Arizona.

Posted by: Judith Solberg at December 14, 2007 9:44 AM

Beautiful photograph, Daniel. As a person who has spent a lot of time in the desert and Death Valley, I can heartily agree with your comment about the aromatic quality of creosote bush, which is especially noticeable after a light rain. I've never thought it smelled especially like creosote, more like paint thinner to me. Many people don't care for the smell, but I love it. It's plants like this and California bay and California sagebrush that really demonstrate "nasal botany." You might also say something about the clonal characteristic of Larrea tridentata, which in terms of individual plants is one of the oldest around, along with bristlecone pine and another clonal species, Populus tremuloides, the quaking aspen. Thanks for sharing this with us.

Posted by: Michael Charters at December 14, 2007 10:05 AM

It seems to me that I've read somewhere that when creosote bushes have been planted in controlled situations where there was plenty of water, they do not exhibit this degree of spacing, which implies that it is not due to any chemicals produced by the plant, but I can't provide a source for that piece of information either.

Posted by: Michael Charters at December 14, 2007 10:09 AM

How nice.. this photo really shows more than a day-time photo would, I bet. Interesting facts too. Thanks again.

Posted by: Sue at December 14, 2007 11:35 AM

Ah, I'm sorry - this is a black-and-white of a daytime scene. It certainly has that night-time look about it, though! What's missing is the lack of shadows from the moon.

Posted by: Daniel Mosquin Author Profile Page at December 14, 2007 12:04 PM

Gorgeous photo. Beautiful depth. I thought I had read - sometime in my distant past - about the use of this plant as a potential fuel source, but now the only articles I can find refer to it as a possible source of 'biomass' because it can be grown on otherwise 'unproductive' land. Ah well.

Posted by: van at December 14, 2007 2:08 PM

Does the spacing make the stands immune to having a fire cycle? Is this another reason for longevity of individuals, or clones across a landscape?

Posted by: Bruce at December 15, 2007 9:28 AM

Regarding the use as a fuel: Never heard of that one! But it was studied for use as something to do with paint and as an antioxidant for foods during WW2, and it has been used for treating skin infections (apparently verified by testing) and for the external treatment of skin cancers. As to its occurrence on "otherwise unproductive lands," I have a recollection of a publication either by NMSU or by the Jornada Experimental Range describing an experiment where this plant, yucca, and mesquite were hand-cleared from a section of rangeland, which I think was then seeded with native grasses but which in any case did finally sustain a native grass population without intervention. The conclusion suggested was that the problem wasn't unproductive soil but that left to themselves, these shrubs seem to act like a climax population.

Posted by: Judith Solberg at December 15, 2007 10:52 AM

Spruce trees in peat bogs in Northern Ontario exhibit a similar wide spacing - it's as if someone drew out a 20 or 30 m grid and planted a tree at each intersection.

Posted by: Jim Service at December 16, 2007 6:34 PM

Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.

About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums

Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.