Amazon.com aStore for UBC Botanical Garden

« Previous Day: Nigella papillosa 'Midnight' | Main | Next Day: Leionema elatius subsp. beckleri »
Aug 28, 2008: Xanthosoma mexicanum
Sep 5, 2007: Curcuma alismatifolia (tentative)
Sep 5, 2006: Littonia modesta
Sep 5, 2005: Cynara scolymus

September 17, 2007 : Quercus agrifolia

Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!


Keywords: Fagaceae | Quercus agrifolia Née | cultivated(?) in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California

Quercus agrifolia

Botany Photo of the Day will have brief written entries on weekends, holidays and my vacations from April through September. – Daniel

Frequent BPotD contributor Eric in SF@Flickr is responsible for today's photograph (original | BPotD Flickr Group Pool). Appreciated as always, Eric.

As noted by the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center's Native Plant Database, Quercus agrifolia is “... the common oak of the California coast and foothills, forming parklike groves that often appear in the scenery of motion pictures made in Hollywood”. Coast live oak (or California live oak) is native to more than the hills near Hollywood – its range extends from coastal north-central California southwards to Baja California (in other words, the California Floristic Province).

Posted by Daniel Mosquin at September 17, 2007 12:00 AM

Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries


Comments

For at least 5 years after moving to San Francisco I thought these spikey-leafed trees were a variety of holly. Originally from New Jersey I was only familiar with white and black oak varieties.
It was only when I happened to see these with acorns that I realized what they were.

Posted by: Stan Flouride at September 17, 2007 2:51 AM

I agree with Stan; my first thought was, gee, a holly with acorns! The leaves are also quite different in texture from the east coast oaks. I assume this helps with water retention. After reflection, I guess the points on the leaves are similar to those in the red oak family in the east.

Posted by: bev at September 17, 2007 5:02 AM

my favorite tree of all time.

Posted by: petra at September 17, 2007 6:51 AM

This was the first latin plant name I learned. I toured school children at Descanso Gardens in La Canada. The oak had tiny wasp galls on the leaves as well as history with the indigenous people. I grew up in Winnipeg and had not heard of live oaks. It is one of my favourite trees too.

Posted by: judy newton at September 17, 2007 9:15 AM

This is native to the Bay Area, but it's absolutely under cultivation. Most, if not all, of Golden Gate Park was sand dunes and coastal scrub vegetation prior to its establishment as a park.

I've added geolocation data showing where I took the shot.

Posted by: Eric in SF at September 17, 2007 10:08 AM

After a year of doing population genetics with the white oak relatives in chicago, I thought I was pretty darn good a IDing oaks. When I came to LA, it took me until acorn season to believe it when people told me this was an oak.

Posted by: Joe at September 17, 2007 10:41 AM

(BTW, I echo everyone else's experience - it took me making a fool of myself telling someone that this was an Ilex only to be corrected by another.)

Posted by: Eric in SF at September 17, 2007 10:51 AM

Has anyone seen a HOLLY OAK(quercus ilex)? I'm still trying to convince a friend that that is an Oak, not a Holly.

Posted by: Joseph Brenner at September 17, 2007 3:24 PM

My first thought today was a different shape acorn. Massachusetts has nothing like this. What wonderful lighting and selective focus. This truely is a grand photo.
Thank you, Margaert-Rae

Posted by: Margaret-Rae Davis at September 17, 2007 4:20 PM

Those of you who grew up with large, stately oaks with nicely lobed leaves, and surprised to learn that that holly is actually an oak, should be totally dumbfounded by the various chaparrel and sage scrub species found on the west coast (e.g. Q. berberidifolia, Q. dumosa & Q. john-tuckeri). In the wild, some of these species rarely exceed 2 meters in height and have leaves the size of a fingernail.

Posted by: Eric Simpson at September 17, 2007 4:30 PM

I was just doing some research, and apparently the genus name Ilex comes from Quercus ilex, a species of Mediterranean oak (in the white oak section) that is also often confused with holly. I would have thought the oak would have been named after the hollies, but it seems like the hollies were named after the oak.

Posted by: Joe at September 17, 2007 4:42 PM

My sister who lives in New England but has traveled extensively in the western states, thinks California is the only state that truly looks like the west. Probably because of the live oak woodlands she has seen in so many old western-themed movies and television shows.

This, the interior live oak, and the canyon live oak, are a major part of the floristic magic of California, just as much as the huge conifers familiar to everyone. I would also include the valley oak and especially the blue oak.

Posted by: Anthony at September 17, 2007 6:46 PM

Quercus agrifolia - Z8 - RHS Index of Garden Plants, Griffiths
Quercus agrifolia - Z9-10 - A-Z Encyclopedia of Garden Plants, Brickell, Cole, Zuk
agrifolia ag-ri-fo-lee-a. With spiny leaves. Dictionary of Plant Names, Coombes

Posted by: Beverley at September 18, 2007 7:42 AM

for me it was the opposite, growing up in california i was used to these scrub oaks and the large lobed leaves of the east coast just dont look like oak trees to me :(

Posted by: petra at September 19, 2007 4:23 PM

California also has probably the largest of the North American Oaks, Quercus lobata, which has the classic lobed oak leaves. They get massive, trunks up to 9 feet wide, and about 100 feet high, with a slightly less wide crown.

Most of the mosters are gone from the Central Valley of California, but they are still pretty common in moister valleys (they require year round access to ground water). These trees used to be dominant in the riparian forests.

Posted by: Barry at September 20, 2007 1:13 PM

Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.

About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums

Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.