« Previous Day: Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands |
Main
| Next Day: Melampyrum arvense »
Nov 6, 2009: Cypripedium montanum
Nov 7, 2008:
Ranunculus aquatilis
Nov 7, 2007:
Quercus suber
Nov 7, 2006:
Pediomelum esculentum
Nov 7, 2005:
Verbascum eriophorum
August 15, 2007 : Carex bebbii
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Cyperaceae | Carex bebbii (L.H. Bailey) Olney ex Fern. | Glennfield, Fish Creek Park, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Another thank you to Anne from Alberta (aka annkelliott@Flickr) for contributing a photograph to BPotD (original via BPotD Flickr Group Pool). Appreciated as always, Anne!
Bebb's sedge is distributed throughout wetland areas of temperate and subarctic North America. Like most members of the Cyperaceae, or sedge family, it has a wind-pollination strategy (i.e., it is anemophilous), with (relatively) “large anthers, long filaments and prominent stigmas” (source: Wendy Zomlefer's Guide to Flowering Plant Families). Without the need to attract insects, the flowers are also apetalous and asepalous (lacking petals or sepals). An alternative way of describing this phenomenon is to say that the perianth is absent.
Most identification keys for Carex species require the plant to have mature fruit, one of the many reasons that botanical field surveys of areas without the luxury of being able to continue fieldwork into the late summer or autumn simply state “Carex spp.” (meaning multiple unidentified species of Carex) in the final list of plant species collected. Plants collected earlier in the year with only vegetative and flowering characters can be extremely difficult to identify to species. The plant in today's photograph likely has mature fruit (or close to it), though the achenes (dry, one-seeded fruits) are hidden within the sac-like perigynia.
Much to the frustration of students learning about the Cyperaceae, though, Carex identification is often difficult even when a specimen has mature fruit. Writers of identification keys sometimes like to throw in a couplet or two about the flowering characteristics midway into the key, which, of course, will not be present in the specimen in front of you (because you collected the plant when it had mature fruit like you were supposed to!). You then learn that a) you actually need to have specimens from the same group of plants in different reproductive stages or b) you need to become a good guesser and expert at the trial and error method of identification. Option b, I think, is quite a popular option.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at August 15, 2007 5:49 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Margaret-Rae Davis at August 15, 2007 8:25 AM
Beautiful photograph. "Sedges have edges" my botany tutor says (to help distinuish them from grasses & rushes). Thanks for the explanations of botanical terminology, all so simply & clearly put for everyone to understand.
Ingrid
Posted by: ingrid at August 15, 2007 5:06 PM
Yes, thanks for the explanation. I helped a professor catalog a sedge collection back in the sixties, and it was, phew, difficult to say the least. Great picture.
Posted by: Meg Bernstein at August 15, 2007 7:04 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

This is of interest to me and I learned so much. It is nice to have the parts of the plant decribed. What a wonderfully sharp picture.
Thanks for the photograph , Margaret-Rae