« Previous Day: Magnolia 'Pegasus' |
Main
| Next Day: Rhododendron traillianum »
Jul 4, 2008: Cypripedium passerinum
Jul 18, 2007:
Calochortus lyallii
Jul 18, 2006:
Penstemon confertus
Jul 18, 2005:
Monotropa uniflora
March 31, 2007 : Magnolia sargentiana var. robusta 'Alba'
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Magnoliaceae | Magnolia sargentiana var. robusta 'Alba' | 022600-0016-1984*
Have I mentioned the magnolias are in bloom?
'Alba' generally means “flowers are white compared to the typical”.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at March 31, 2007 7:14 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Douglas Justice at March 31, 2007 11:14 AM
Quote . . . 'Alba' generally means “flowers are white compared to the typical”.
Does this mean this individual is wrongly labelled? Looks distinctly pink to me!
Posted by: Michael F at March 31, 2007 3:36 PM
I wouldn't want to turn the head of Vancouverites, but your gardens are so far ahead of us! No sign of magnolia blossoms yet - the forsythia and camellia are just coming out.
Posted by: Marjorie Jarrett at March 31, 2007 6:26 PM
Yes: Looks like the form grown as the typical var. robusta, with pink tepals shading to darker color at the base. One acquired as supposedly purple 'Blood Moon' had a single flower here this year that wasn't much darker than the one shown. Of course, 'dark' forms of Sec. Yulania magnolias often turn out to vary in depth of coloring from one year to the next. Different specimens in the same general vicinity will also differ during the same year. And first blooms produced on a new specimen may not be fully representative.
If there is, in fact a bona fide pure white 'Alba' in western cultivation presently UBC tree probably grown from seed (rather than scions) taken from an 'Alba' or received under the wrong name, due to a labeling mixup at a nursery.
Posted by: Ron B at March 31, 2007 6:30 PM
My mouth waters when I see your magnolias.
Anonymous quote: Woman has no seductions for the man who cannot keep his eyes off his magnolias.
Posted by: Sue Webster at April 1, 2007 12:02 AM
I agree with Sue and loved the quote!
Posted by: Cyndy Henderson at April 1, 2007 10:37 AM
So THAT'S why I've had so few girlfriends! But wait: I DO look at them, too. They just aren't looking back.
The tree shown is just pale enough at the stage of development its flowers are at that perhaps 'Alba' is actually a hyperbolic name for a pale pink clone that the UBC specimen does represent. I've had this idea in my mind the whole time bt didn't mention it (have probably seen other photos and discussion elsewhere). When I am back home I will look it up.
Posted by: Ron B at April 1, 2007 11:49 AM
I looked in three magnolia treatments (Callaway, Gardiner, Rankin) I have here. It is mentioned that var. robusta varies from white to purple and a few white or nearly white cultivars are mentioned. However, none of these are called 'Alba' and one author (Rankin) shows a plant with pretty much the same flowers as those shown here with the comment "This pale pink form grows at Nymans in Sussex."
Posted by: Ron B at April 5, 2007 10:32 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

A stunning shot, Daniel. Yet again, you've captured the uncultivated sumptuousness of these luminous flowers.