« Previous Day: Echinopsis oxygona |
Main
| Next Day: Persicaria bistorta 'Superba' »
Nov 6, 2009: Cypripedium montanum
Nov 7, 2008:
Ranunculus aquatilis
Nov 7, 2007:
Quercus suber
Nov 7, 2006:
Pediomelum esculentum
Nov 7, 2005:
Verbascum eriophorum
May 25, 2006 : Holboellia angustifolia subsp. angustifolia
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Lardizabalaceae | Holboellia angustifolia Wallich. subsp. angustifolia | 023221-0083-1983 | SABE.1704
For this week's garden inventory, we're trying to verify the information and labels for plants by taxonomic groupings instead of by planted beds. Our priorities for this inventory round are plants in the Styracaceae family (e.g., Melliodendron xylocarpum), Poaceae (e.g., Harpochloa falx, Berberidaceae (minus Epimedium, e.g., Mahonia ×media 'Charity'), Ericaceae (minus Rhododendron, e.g., Enkianthus campanulatus), conifers (e.g., Pinus thunbergii) and the family Lardizabalaceae, such as the plant in today's image, Holboellia angustifolia.
A monoecious plant, both female and male flowers are present on the same individual plant (Vanderbilt University has a small resource that explains sexual systems in flowering plants). Shown in today's photograph are the fragrant female flowers. Plants for a Future describes the plant as having a “startling blue-metallic colour”, but I've yet to see a fruit (or taste its edible pulp!).
Photography resource link: for inspiration, an iris study and tour by frequent BPotD contributor, bbum@flickr (Bill). Bill put together this set of photographs from a recent walk in his San Jose, California neighbourhood. I've a personal attachment to irises so his set of photos resonated for me on more than an aesthetic level.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at May 25, 2006 1:10 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Douglas Justice at May 25, 2006 2:27 PM
...art work...
Posted by: victor at May 26, 2006 8:21 AM
My Holboellia angustifolia bloomed for the first time this year. The flowers were white! I was hoping for purple. Any idea what happened?
Posted by: L. Baumgartner at June 1, 2008 8:23 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools
Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.
Previously known in the trade as Holboellia fargesii, H. angustifolia is much sought after by lovers of evergreen climbers. Its neat, palmately compound leaves are, well, neat. Here at UBC, it grows like a bomb, but in colder gardens the species probably suffers. I think it's the perfect covering for a shaded chainlink fence.
Unfortunately, holboellias are difficult to propagate from stem cuttings. Every year in the propagation section of my horticulture techniques course, I bring along a few metres of stem for the students to try, and every so often somebody gets it right and gets to take home a rooted plant. If I was a better scientist, I'd figure out what set of conditions promotes rooting. There is some commercial production of this species, but it is limited and plants are expensive, which suggests that I'm not the only one who has trouble.
Daniel states above that the female flowers are fragrant, but it looks to me that both male and female flowers share that characteristic. In this species, both male and female flowers are abundantly produced, but in others it appears that the males are rarer. This makes identification difficult, as the dichotomous keys we use (from the Flora of China) often require the identifier to look at stamen characteristics.