« Previous Day: Helianthemum 'Henfield Brilliant' |
Main
| Next Day: Echinopsis oxygona »
Nov 6, 2009: Cypripedium montanum
Nov 7, 2008:
Ranunculus aquatilis
Nov 7, 2007:
Quercus suber
Nov 7, 2006:
Pediomelum esculentum
Nov 7, 2005:
Verbascum eriophorum
May 23, 2006 : Erysimum 'Emm's Variety'
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Brassicaceae | Erysimum 'Emm's Variety' | 036649-0672-2003
If you visit UBC Botanical Garden and examine the plant labels while enjoying the garden, you'll eventually notice that we use two different colours of plant labels – black and red. Black labels are used when we're reasonably certain about all of the information on the label, including the name, identity of the plant, distribution of the taxon, and accession number (read: unique identifier – it's the number you often see in the keywords with UBC Garden-based BPotD entries). Sometimes, however, there is uncertainty, and the plant receives a red label. This occurs most often for three reasons:
- we haven't been able to verify the name of the plant and therefore can't confirm its identity. This often occurs with obscure cultivars or plants from regions of the world that are poorly documented
- the name of the plant is verifiable, but we don't trust that the name accompanying the plant is correct (a misidentiication)
- we aren't able to fully identify the plant. This generally occurs with wild collected material that has been identified only to genus level. It may take years before the plants display characteristics that will allow the plant to be fully identified (e.g., it may not flower for a decade).
Erysimum 'Emm's Variety' is an example of the first reason. While cultivated plants require little in the way of process before assigning a name (compared to the peer-reviewed publication model of scientific names), a minimal bit of documentation would be publication in a nursery's catalogue or plant exchange list. Given the number of nurseries, it is an impossible task to track down every cultivar to its origin, so we often rely on a combination of the various cultivar registration authorities and search engines to help discover if a cultivar name is in use. Well, if you try to search for Erysimum 'Emm's Variety', I guarantee you'll come up as short as we have. The only documentation we've been able to locate is in the Royal Horticultural Society's Database, where it is listed as “tentatively accepted”. It therefore gets a red label until we can find a way to track down more information.
Photography resource link: Fodor's has a section on its web site dedicated to travel photography, “Focus on Photography – How to Take Travel Pictures Like a Pro”. It reads like the article was written before the advent of digital cameras (!), as I couldn't find a single mention of the word “digital”, but it still has plenty of timeless suggestions and tips.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at May 23, 2006 12:00 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Elizabeth at May 24, 2006 10:13 AM
Hi Elizabeth - unfortunately, no, we don't have the resources. For cultivated plants, we generally rely on larger institutions, the Royal Horticultural Society's “plants of interest” surveys (where they take a group of plants and evaluate and define a number of cultivars against each other) or exceptional horticulturists to produce definitive books.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at May 24, 2006 11:25 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

Does UBC have the means to test and deduce botanical aspects by cross referencing similar varieties of the same species? Could UBC be a reliable source for such findings? I don't see why not, other than being totally wrapped up in hundreds of other cases such as this!