« Previous Day: Magnolia sprengeri 'Copeland Court' |
Main
| Next Day: Carex montana »
May 9, 2008: Musa textilis
May 11, 2007:
Ornithogalum nutans
May 11, 2006:
Prosartes hookeri var. oregana
May 11, 2005:
Passiflora alata
April 13, 2006 : Desert Garden in Huntington Botanical Gardens
Keywords: Huntington Botanical Gardens, San Marino, California
A small scene packed with diversity of form and colour from the 4ha (10 acres) Desert Garden at Huntington Botanical Gardens. Instead of me pointing out the desert adaptations visible in the photograph, I'll open it up for you to identify and elaborate in the comments today. I quickly count five visible phenomena that help these plants survive in the desert, but there are likely more.
For local readers of BPotD, I've been informed that tickets remain available for tonight's lecture by Robert Bateman on “Thinking Like a Mountain”. The event is part of a biodiversity lecture series hosted by the in-construction Beaty Museum of Natural History at UBC. I highly encourage you to attend.
Photography resource link: I missed out on attending / promoting a few local photographic highlights while away, including Ron Long's Cedar Series Lecture about last year's wildflower display at Death Valley (this year was a below-average to average year) and David Blevin's workshops – I've previously linked to David's work on BPotD, but there's been a new addition to the site worth investigating: “A Nature Guide to Boundary Bay” promotes a book with David's photography and Anne Murray's writing. However, it also stands as a resource web site in its own right, particularly since the site includes a number of photographs which didn't make it into the book.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at April 13, 2006 12:08 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Gordon Worley at April 13, 2006 7:29 AM
What looks like a cactus in the far right of the photo is actually a species of Euphorbia, I believe.
Posted by: Matt at April 13, 2006 7:49 AM
Matt you are right the cactus thing in the far right is a euphorbia. I'm not sure which one though the euphorbia genus is huge. The plant in the middle of the photo is a Euphorbia also, probably Euphorbia milii aka crown of thorns.
I wish i could grow all the plants in this picture in my backyard, but its too cold where i live.
Posted by: William Osborne at April 13, 2006 8:56 AM
Here's my contribution to this desert adaptation exercise: the blue tint to some of the plants is probably due to a layer of wax that prevents moisture loss.
Posted by: Steve at April 13, 2006 9:25 AM
You're right about the Euphorbia milii, William. I suppose another task would be to see if someone can identify all of the plants in the photograph to genus - though I think there are fewer than a handful.
To summarize the desert adaptations mentioned so far:
1) reduction of leaves to prevent water loss
2) succulent strategy, whether it be in leaf tissue or stem tissue, to increase water storage
3) development of physical barriers to herbivory to discourage water loss either by direct ingestion or secondary damage
4) waxy cuticle to prevent water loss
Those are 4 of the 5 I was thinking of. Anyone else?
Gordon, I'm not certain about the flower colour. You're general observations about the colour of desert flowers is accurate (although I do have a blue-coloured desert flower photograph in the queue).
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 13, 2006 9:46 AM
its a wonderful picture
Posted by: vera at April 13, 2006 11:13 AM
On a different topic, if you appreciate the Invasive Species Weblog as much as I do, head on over there and give Jennifer a thank-you for four years of educating about this critical conservation issue.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 13, 2006 11:39 AM
On flower color: I wonder if the most common pollinators in the desert are hummingbirds, who can see red well. Insects supposedly are more attracted to yellow and blue flowers (and also those with ultraviolet markings) as they cannot see in the red range.
Posted by: Ginny Remeika at April 13, 2006 3:01 PM
In terms of desert adaptations, spines are also effective radiators. Spines (modified leaves) and thorns (modified branches) have intimate contact (at least initially) with the plant's vasculature. Most of the succulent euphorbias (including the ones pictured--Euphorbia coerulescens? and E. millii) have thorns, not spines. Such long, thin extensions that protrude into the surrounding air act much like the fins of a radiator. (see http://www.californiadesert.gov/plants.php). Indeed, the very ribs and tubercles of cacti and similarly adapted plants have some heat exchanging value themselves.
Armature also provides shade, and particularly when densely produced, considerable insulation (from increased boundary layer resistance).
Succulence is a well recognized adaption to water thriftiness, but there is a continuum of drought adaptability in succulents, from the merely fleshy to the entirely succulent. Here we see the blue, terete-leafed Senecio mandraliscae, pictured lower right, which has a moderate ability to withstand drought. The arborescent aloes (Aloe bainesii?) have reservoirs of water in both leaves and stems (the leaves, the more expendable). Tubercled cacti and ribbed-stemmed euphorbias and barrel and tree cacti, have the ability to inflate their stems accordian-like when water is available.
To Ginny's question: All of the tubular red flowers pictured (Aloes) are predominantly bird pollinated, but since they are African plants, we can rule out hummingbirds. I wonder whether Euphorbia millii is also bird pollinated. Insects are evidently not signalled as strongly by the colour red as are birds (they can see it, but don't always associate it with food), but the crown of thorns' flowers don't look particularly bird adapted. (see http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=521733).
What a great garden, and what a superb picture.
Posted by: Douglas Justice at April 13, 2006 3:43 PM
How about photosynthetic stems? This goes hand-in-hand with reduction of leaf surface...
Posted by: Justine at April 14, 2006 6:58 AM
Getting back to the picture itself - This is so beautiful. The light seems sourceless - did you use some kind of reflector, or was it just surreal by itself?
Posted by: Chris Grant at April 17, 2006 6:49 AM
Justine - sure, I agree.
I was also thinking along the lines of compact shapes and forms reducing air movement around the photosynthetic tissue, i.e., creating a still-air zone against dessicating winds. It's probably the weakest of the five adaptations I was thinking of.
Chris - it was the best light I had on the entire trip (or at least when I had camera in hand), so it was nearly surreal - but entirely real. You did have to be looking for it, though.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at April 17, 2006 10:55 PM
that pictire is amazing im definately printing it out. it is so pretty.but is that a real desert cause im doin a project on deserts. write back cause i want to talk to u about the picture
Posted by: brittany at September 20, 2006 2:55 PM
Hi Brittany, this is a cultivated desert garden, so all of the plants in it were purposefully placed (and it is growing in the middle of a city!)
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at September 20, 2006 4:36 PM
This is not of much reference to this picture, but could somebody please explain how the waxy surface on cacti prevent water loss?
Thankyou
Posted by: Olivia at October 19, 2006 5:39 AM
This is a beautiful picture...and I am amazed that it is grown in the city. I cannot tell in this photo but if any have hair on their leaves it would also be helpful in preventing waterloss by decreasing winds over the evaporative surfaces.
Posted by: Tina at December 26, 2006 3:49 PM
One adaptation I see that has only been somewhat brushed over is the red pigmentation at the tips of some leaves. I would guess that it is indicative of anthocyanins or other accessory pigments that help reduce genetic damage caused by ultraviolet radiation, as well as acting as a slight fungicide, among other benefits.
Posted by: Joe at August 9, 2007 11:26 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

It's been a while since I took a botany course, but let's see if I can get a few.
Most of the plants have small leaves, and I know that some desert plants, even though they aren't succulents, look like them because they develop thick leaves. I suspect this is an adaptation to the desert, where there is lots of sun almost every day that could suck moisture out of the plant. By reducing surface to mass ratio, the plants can retain more water by exposing less of themselves to evaporation.
Similarly, most desert plants I've encountered have tough exteriors, not in that they have a rough texture, but that they are thick, strong, and opaque (unlike the thin leaves of tropical plants where I live).
Speaking of exteriors, though, the classic desert plant, the cactus, does have some extra exterior properties. Most cacti have spins to keep animals from cracking them open to drink the moisture stored in their leaves.
Of the flowers in the picture, all are red. I don't know if this might mean something, but thinking back on all the desert plants I've ever seen, I don't recall any having blue flowers, for example.
I can't think of any more right now. Maybe others can help.