« Previous Day: Arbutus unedo f. rubra |
Main
| Next Day: Rosmarinus officinalis 'Trusty' »
Nov 6, 2009: Cypripedium montanum
Nov 7, 2008:
Ranunculus aquatilis
Nov 7, 2007:
Quercus suber
Nov 7, 2006:
Pediomelum esculentum
Nov 7, 2005:
Verbascum eriophorum
December 15, 2005 : Elleanthus caravata
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Orchidaceae | Elleanthus caravata (Aubl.) Rchb. f. | cultivated in San Francisco, California
Eric in San Francisco (Eric in SF@Flickr) submitted today's image of this orchid via the BPotD Flickr Group Pool (original image). Eric has hundreds (thousands?) of plant and garden-related photographs on Flickr, and it's worthwhile browsing through his sets – for example, his Erica sessiliflora from UC Berkeley Botanical Garden is amazing. Thanks Eric!
Elleanthus caravata is (at the very least) native to Venezuela, Guiana, French Guiana, Surinam and Brazil (sources: The Genus Elleanthus and Stewart and Griffiths' “Manual of Orchids”). I've found another source claiming a distribution in (only) Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. No other reference makes that latter assertion, so I mention it as a possibility that needs confirmation from someone with access to more orchid information than I have available to me.
Today's plant presents another mystery. What is the derivation of caravata? I'd welcome any suggestions, because both Douglas Justice and myself came up empty-handed. The clues of importance are that the plant was originally described from a specimen collected in French Guiana. The author of the original plant name (or basionym), Serapias caravata, was Jean Baptiste Christophore Fusée Aublet, a French botanist. A placename? A derivation of a French word from the 18th century? Thoughts?
The photographed plant was cultivated by Bruce Rogers, also of San Francisco.
Invasives resource link: One Hundred of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species is a subset of the Global Invasive Species Database. It's not restricted to plants, but of the plants that are listed, one has been featured on BPotD.
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at December 15, 2005 12:00 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: Beverley at December 15, 2005 8:03 AM
Caravata is a Portuguese surname. (Also modern Greek.) There seem to be other species named caravata by Aublet, so perhaps it was after an individual by that name. Any similar words in classical or late Latin have to do with either linen or boats, which seems unlikely. It is a gorgeous flower, which has something bromeliad-like about it. Could this be a case of convergent evolution in a very similar environment?
Posted by: Anthony at December 15, 2005 2:31 PM
Generally, though, a surname has -ii appended to it, e.g., menziesiii, thomsonii (to use a recent examples), or aubletii (I checked, and some plants are named after Aublet).
If you're interested about convergent evolution, see convergent evolution via Wikipedia. From what is possible to discern via a photograph, it would appear so, though I think a cross-section of the inflorescences of each would be necessary to ensure similar form and function.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at December 15, 2005 3:35 PM
Individual flowers do look like they are sitting in boats, so if he had not used "caravata" for other plants...
Posted by: Ron B at December 15, 2005 3:35 PM
Another clue via Douglas: The suffix -atus / -ata / -atum indicates (in the verb sense) an action made or done.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at December 15, 2005 3:53 PM
Stearn, BOTANICAL LATIN (David & Charles), under Latin Adjectival Suffixes (p. 299):
"-atus -a -um: (1) indicates possession or likeness; noun base; e.g. capitatus, with a head (from caput, head), ovatus, egg-shaped (from ovum, egg); (2) perfect participal ending of verbs of First Conjugation, indicating an action made or done; e.g. fucatus, coloured (from fucare, to colour)."
Posted by: Ron B at December 15, 2005 4:58 PM
Likeness to a caravel (a Portuguese sailing boat)?
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at December 15, 2005 5:21 PM
And the caravel is on its way
I can hear the merry gypsies play...
Posted by: Ron B at December 15, 2005 6:26 PM
Indeed most species names that are adopted from proper names are in the genitive case of the latinized name. In this case that would unpack as caravatae. I cannot find a latin verb that would support caravatus or caravata as a perfect passive participle as suggested. I checked Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, and Catalan dictionaries to no avail, for both caravata and carabada; there is a Gascon or Pyranean dialect word crabata or carabata, meaning cravat or necktie, but that is going over the top. The only biographical information I saw on Aublet online was an interesting but unhelpful paragraph on French wikipedia. However, I wonder if Aublet did not have some Brazilian assistant whom he might have named specimens for as Humboldt (in the same territory) named them for Bonpland (e.g. Ephynes bonplandii).
Posted by: Anthony at December 15, 2005 8:19 PM
At http://www.thermashotel.com.br/ESP/Bromelia_pinguin.htm the name caravata is listed under "other popular names" for Bromelia pinguin. Perhaps the name Elleanthus caravata was chosen to reflect the similarity of the inflorescence to a bromeliad.
Posted by: Steve at December 16, 2005 9:31 AM
Steve I think you have hit the nail on the head. The interesting site you mentioned gave caraguata as a synonym - caraguata is the popular Spanish name for Tillandsia rubra and Bromelia serra, so we seem to have a Latin American term for a range of bromeliads. As mentioned above, the similarity to a bromeliad inflorescence is striking. Thanks for the insight! It would be nice if we had some Central or South American bioethnologists chipping in!
Posted by: Anthony at December 16, 2005 12:07 PM
I like that last one. However, again, the thing to do--short of finding a description of the orchid that explains the naming--is to discover what all the plants named "caravata" might have in common. If this is the only one that resembles a bromeliad than that probably wouldn't be it--unless the epithet was applied for varying reasons.
Posted by: Ron B at December 16, 2005 12:10 PM
Hi Daniel
Looking at this intriguing orchid , I see a necktie or cravat of yellow florets Perhaps stretching a bit but check out . . . http://www.croatians.com/tie.htm
Brian
Posted by: Brian at December 18, 2005 8:36 PM
Brian, I considered that as well, but I don't know what a cravat would look like three hundred years ago. I lean towards Steve's suggestion.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at December 19, 2005 4:43 AM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

Elleanthus caravata - Z10 - RHS Index of Garden Plants, Griffiths