« Previous Day: Pinus ponderosa |
Main
| Next Day: Paris polyphylla »
Nov 6, 2009: Cypripedium montanum
Nov 6, 2008:
Conophytum maughanii
Nov 6, 2007:
Tricoryne simplex
Nov 6, 2006:
Hakea laurina
Nov 6, 2005:
Osmanthus heterophyllus
July 4, 2005 : Populus tremuloides
Interested in subscribing? Visit the main Botany Photo of the Day page and fill out the form in the upper right corner!
Keywords: Salicaceae | Populus tremuloides Michx. | Gracillariidae | Phyllocnistis populiella Chambers
I'm a fan of trembling aspen. Few plants can be said to make a memorable noise or movement, but the flutter of aspen leaves in a breeze is oft a subject of prose, including Shakespeare.
The culprit behind the designs on these leaves is another matter. I believe no one has yet written “An Ode to Phyllocnistis populiella”, the aspen serpentine leafminer. The larva of this moth will tunnel and eat its way through both the spongy mesophyll and the chlorophyll-dense palisade mesophyll of a leaf, leaving behind a whitened snake-like pattern bisected by a brown trail of excreta.
When there is a mass infestation of aspen serpentine leafminers, whole stands of trembling aspen will change from green to silver in appearance. This is what I observed in the area surrounding Merritt, British Columbia, a couple weekends ago, and I regret not getting a landscape shot of these “silver ghosts”. It was a phenomenon I'd never seen before.
However, it seems like I'll have more opportunities in the future. It has been anecdotally reported that mass infestations are on the increase, speculatively due to a rise in winter mean temperature (source: “Leafminer Impacts on Photosynthetic Ability of Populus tremuloides” (PDF), a research paper by Kaarle Strailey as part of coursework at Berkeley).
Posted by Daniel Mosquin at July 4, 2005 12:07 AM
Read recent comments on all BPotD Entries
Comments
Posted by: pam in DM,CA at July 4, 2005 7:13 AM
Daniel,
Not to be too pedantic, but I believe it is convention to refer to the North American Populus tremuloides as "quaking aspen," and the European P. tremula as "trembling aspen." A stunning image, nevertheless.
Posted by: Douglas Justice at July 4, 2005 2:14 PM
Yes, I was going to comment on that same thing: I have never heard it called "trembling" aspen. One of my favorite trees. I like your site very much.
Posted by: Kathryn Knowles at July 6, 2005 5:26 AM
I need to step in and defend my choice of common name it seems! Using Google as a guide for a “scientific” survey:
“Populus tremuloides” “quaking aspen” -- 17500 hits
“Populus tremuloides” “trembling aspen” -- 10600 hits
“Populus tremula” “quaking aspen” -- 314 hits
“Populus tremula” “trembling aspen” -- 1150 hits
“Populus tremula” “European aspen” -- 515 hits
“Populus tremuloides” -- 61400 hits
“Populus tremula” -- 80400 hits
So, quaking aspen is more commonly used than trembling aspen re: Populus tremuloides, but both are found on pages far more often for Populus tremuloides than Populus tremula. However, where I grew up...
“Populus tremuloides” “quaking aspen” Manitoba -- 506 hits
“Populus tremuloides” “trembling aspen” Manitoba -- 569 hits
A regional difference in popularity of a common name is fairly common. I'll give another example: Acer negundo. I guarantee most people use “box elder”, but where I'm from, it's “Manitoba maple”.
That's the nature of common names. This is one reason why we use scientific names throughout the site and all of the labels in the garden, i.e., we're all speaking about the same plant. It's particularly important when the audience is broader than local or regional, like in a garden (or on a web site) with international visitors.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at July 6, 2005 9:06 AM
This Oregonian travels in BC and Alberta quite often. Usage in the States seems to generally be "quaking aspen", while in Canada I usually see and hear "trembling aspen".
Thanks for the great website, Mr. Mosquin!
Posted by: Doug Gorsline at July 21, 2005 9:30 PM
"Box elder"? It's "swamp maple" to many New Englanders. *g*
Posted by: Susan at August 15, 2005 1:06 AM
I heard that the quaking aspen are not trees but a fungi. Is this true?
Posted by: sagiquarius at November 4, 2005 10:41 AM
sagiquarius - in a word, no. I'm not certain where there might be any confusion on the matter.
Posted by: Daniel Mosquin
at November 7, 2005 12:58 AM
I think it may be the name of the rooting structures of both aspens and fungi being similar which confounds Saqiquarius.
The aspen stand is very often a single unit interconnected by a common root structure- the names for the runner roots are similar or the same as the anchor structure of fungi.
Posted by: ZeroK at March 28, 2006 2:09 PM
DM wrote: sagiquarius - in a word, no. I'm not certain where there might be any confusion on the matter.
my memory isn't as good as it was in my younger years, but it seems I once heard that the largest "single" organism on earth is a fungus ... and that the second largest is an aspen stand in the Rockies somewhere. . . I wonder if that has anything to do with Saqiquarius' confusion???
Vague enough to be a toss-up on whether it's true or not. heh
I love calling aspens trembling aspens. To me, it sounds more poetic. :)
Posted by: Maureen at July 5, 2006 12:00 PM
Hi there,
You all seem to know a lot more about Aspens than I do - can someone tell me about Populus trem. erecta? I read that tag on one in a parking lot as I love the skinny shape and am considering them for along my back fence. Is it a quaking aspen with the massive height potential? I don't want to plant something tat will get massive quickly but am having trouble finding them locally anyway (White Rock)
-thanks!
Posted by: gilly at April 1, 2007 8:45 AM
silver ghosts, that'd make a sweet song.
It's amazing how many things are influenced by this global climate change. Big and Small. Everything is affected.
Posted by: MadelineSpooner at June 9, 2008 3:58 PM
My two cents' worth re common names....
I've lived in Ontario all my life, and the terms I'm most familiar with are "trembling aspen" and Manitoba maple.
I love this website!
Posted by: Mary Ann, in Toronto at July 4, 2008 9:23 PM
Please share your comments about the photograph(s) and accompanying write-up. Telling a story about the subject of the photograph(s) is also much appreciated! If you have a gardening question, the best place to ask is on the UBC Botanical Garden Forums. Thank you!
Post a comment
XML Feeds: Atom | RSS 2.0 | RSS 1.0 | What is RSS? | RSS Tools

Botany Photo of the Day and all associated images are licensed under a Creative Commons License except when otherwise specified in the accompanying written entry.
About Botany Photo of the Day | Submit Your Photos via Flickr | Submit Your Photos via UBCBG's Discussion Forums
Botany Photo of the Day is a project of the UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, located in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. UBC BGCPR is a department of the Faculty of Land and Food Systems within The University of British Columbia.

even though ive been working in some nursing capacity or another since the age of 17(have been an rn with a bsn since 1972), my 1st degree was in biology cause ilove nature. thanks for another winner, DM!