|
Re: Oshu beni
Andre,
I have removed my previous post and photos as I have come to believe that the Vertrees description in the 3rd ed. of a 7-9 lobe palmatum is correct for Oshu beni, not the red amoenum type tree I pictured. It was my mistake to rely so heavily on the label rather than a solid text description. Even a plant from a reliable source is not always what we wish it to be. The tree I previously pictured will resurface under the correct name as some point, should I come to know it.
As for your question below, the validity of the photo you linked, that tree would certainly not meet the lobe division description in the text of "divided 2/3" of the way to the leaf base or petiole nor would that tree qualify as "faintly toothed."
Vertrees lists many so called synonyms as usual, so that might speak to the issue of multiple forms or a confused history. Sorry I have no more to share about the plant.
MJH
Last edited by mjh1676; November 17th, 2005 at 10:07 PM.
|